素王刺杀老大哥的阅读体悟

  1. 2016-03-02

    评《11876209✭✭✭✩✩

    Malley's book is not convincing due to its lack of enough primary sources. Its method is also problematic which only do a literature closing reading of elites' thoughts without exploring the actual entanglement between money E and race in common people's daily life.

  2. 2018-02-12

    评《Towards a New Architecture✭✭✭✭✭

    Modernist architecture's flagship text; btw, when you become the boss, you would be able to write in such a discursive, fractured and repetitive style without being penalized by painful grad students and perhaps some common readers that tried to grasp your idea.

  3. 2016-01-31

    评《Sovereignty and Authenticity✭✭✭✭✩

    Besides empire-building, what attracts me most is the transcendence of the redemptive societies under the control of that nightmare puppet empire. For them, the Way is the only final target. The regime could ONLY be a tool, or even worse, a stage.

  4. 2015-12-01

    评《Printing and Book Culture in Late Imperial China✭✭✭✭✩

    This book shows that only a hardworking and careful historian can handle premodern Chinese printing history. The breakthrough upon previous studies can only happen after painstaking reading for searching for historical evidence.

  5. 2013-08-03

    评《中国文明✭✭✭✩✩

    翻译确实不得劲。此书的有趣现象就是中国人类学者对此书的重视和历史学者对此的漠视。就史实解读来说,除了安特生考古成果外,葛兰言并没有比乾嘉学派学者拥有更多的材料,自然出不了什么能引起兰克主义的中国史学注意的成果。人类学的意义就容不得我放厥词,王铭铭对此书的重视已经说明了问题。不过我还是很居心叵测地翻对了王老师在《西方作为他者》对此书的引用,不知是不是我读书粗陋,又像上次核对汪晖老师对《日知录》的引文一样,在原书中没找到对应的句子。

  6. 2018-02-08

    评《30143105✭✭✭✭✩

    Althusserian historical materialist approach to understand how the capitalist mode of production has shaped our understanding of the clock-time system and the worldwide social time regime supports and enables it.

  7. 2013-08-31

    评《The End of Poverty✭✭✭✩✩

    Sachs先生的雄心壮志值得让人钦佩。而且经济学者的接地气和实践性强也让我思考。但不得不说Sachs站着说话不腰疼。他把赌注全压在了技术进步上。并且认为新殖民主义和经济帝国主义并不是主要阻拦现今贫困的原因。另外他也忽视了发展中国家低下的政治体系对经济发展的阻滞。我十分欢迎Sachs以卧底身份伪装成一位某先进科技的推广者(最好是高铁什么的)来中国实际田野调查一番,体验改变贫困的复杂性。

  8. 2013-05-29

    评《反抗绝望✭✭✭✩✩

    为什么我读了汪晖先生和葛兆光先生的书后的感觉与李鸿宾老师完全相反。。。我觉得汪老先生的著作实在是绕得不行,让人完全没耐心看下去,葛兆光先生的书倒是感觉条理还清晰些。《反抗绝望》比《现代中国思想的兴起》简练些,但感觉还是可以写得更有条理些,这段时间读绕来绕去的书读烦了,没心情给高分了

  9. 2016-02-02

    评《26267285✭✩✩✩✩

    Neoliberalism cliche. a very dangerous book obscuring the dark sides of modernity. Even reading one page of this book would be wasting time.

  10. 2012-08-04

    评《民主是一种现代生活✭✭✭✭✩

    虽然这本书从学术角度有一些可供大家讨论的地方。但它确实开启我民智的一本书,感谢蔡先生启发了我这颗之前愚昧的被洗白过的脑袋。对现实政体和国家未来走向有疑惑的青年,以及各位标榜自己具有高度服务人民热情的人却懒得在高中课本基础上多看一本书的人,读一读这本书吧,不要让我觉得你们虚伪至极。

  11. 2016-12-02

    评《26686628✭✭✭✭✭

    Literally read word by word. Both ideologies in the Cold War deviated from its promises of democracy and safety in factory management.

  12. 2016-02-06

    评《China's English✭✭✭✭✩

    Although the book's own scope is limited in traditional education studies, it inspires me a potential orientation of future studies.

  13. 2012-08-04

    评《东晋门阀政治✭✭✭✭✩

    辛苦的从图书馆借了最后一本还在架上的出来。不了解两晋史,看这本书实在吃力,勉强啃了大概。感觉能把两晋南北朝通史写清楚的都是牛人。田余庆先生关于门阀政治只存在于东晋,及对门阀政治这一复杂概念的明晰,表现了他十足的史学功底,这本书确实配得上荣新江所称的博士论文的榜样。

  14. 2016-02-06

    评《The Cheese and the Worms✭✭✭✭✩

    Argument is questionable, but very readable. I feel sad when I read the last several chapters stating that Menocchio was executed.

  15. 2016-06-02

    评《地標:北京的空間政治✭✭✭✩✩

    As a pioneering work, it is a must-read in any related literature reviews. Although this topic does need to be further explored.

  16. 2014-06-04

    评《Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe✭✭✭✭✩

    定量研究(对,你没看错!)+阶级分析法研究中东欧小民族民族主义神作!一大串表格分析小民族的民族主义者中不同阶级所占的比例来精确退到民族主义兴起的公式。虽略浮夸,但颇有新意。看看人家捷克人,人家也是社会主义期间写出来的东西,这么就甩某文化繁荣大国几条街呢。

  17. 2017-07-24

    评《如何有效阅读一本书✭✭✭✩✩

    书中谈的基本上是研究生阶段都会学到和养成的读书习惯,所以读起来没有什么新意。不过关于尽量缩减读书笔记的篇幅的方法倒是给自己提了醒。应通读全章或全书(视书本的长度而定)后,再重复读自己划线的地方,再确定什么适合记下来,避免重复记前后都提过的东西。

  18. 2013-02-09

    评《抑郁与超越✭✭✭✭✭

    写得还是不错的。但是体例十分奇怪,导论是对后头所有正文论文的概述,看完导论后再看正文索然无味。不过附录中所收三篇文章都十分给人以启发。尤其最后一篇,作者对中国史学一直未能在向通俗界作出足够努力,以至于影响力甚至比不过文学和戏剧学的批评颇有见地。

  19. 2016-09-15

    评《26684744✭✭✭✭✭

    Benedict Anderson shows that a real internationalist should respect cultural diversity and minority rights. 各美其美,天下大同。

  20. 2016-06-13

    评《4138762✭✭✭✭✩

    Do you realize that the design of your apartment may have been directly linked with the fate of socialism/liberalism?

 1-20/151

谁是 素王刺杀老大哥 ?

素王刺杀老大哥,住在北京,2011年11月25日下午08点16分00秒加入豆瓣。至今已经7年16天6小时31分2秒。


北京魏公村世界一流(呵呵)民族大学历史系学生一名。
不喜雾霾,眷念岭南家乡。
意欲踏上求道之“道”,自身天赋却先天不足。
尤好关心人之精神世界,
爱好设身处地体认前人所思所想,
希望能在知识分子的命运这一题目中找到人生的意义和努力的方向。
唯一优点:勤于思考,乐于崩溃!